Or the opening for the Ruy Lopez, exchange variation is: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Bxc6 It is best to keep record of all your chess games and perhaps enter them into a database, or use your scoresheet to study what you did right or wrong, or prepare an opening or against you opponent the next time you play. Chess Principles 1. Volume A of the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings is dedicated to openings that don't begin with 1.e4 or 1.d4. Those openings that don't involve the immediate movement of the central pawns, but the outer pawns on files a,b,c,f,g and h. A00 is for the Irregular Openings alone and there are quite a few. The Encyclopedia of Chess Openings (or ECO) is a classification system for the opening moves in chess. It is presented as a five-volume book collection (now also a computer database) describing chess openings. XNXX.COM 'mertua vs menantu jepang' Search, free sex videos. Bokep Jepang Ngentot Dengan Mertua Mesum - Situsbokep.Org. 15 min - 6,193,707 hits. Watch Free Vidio Bokep Mertua Vs Menantu Jepang Hot Porn Vidio Bokep Mertua Vs Menantu Jepang Videos and Download it. Watch and Download Video Bokep Mertua Vs Menantu Jepang Hot Porn Video Bokep Mertua Vs Menantu Jepang MP4 Movie and Download to Phone. Video Bokep Mertua Vs Menantu Jepang Download sex porn tube videos free, mobile sex porn tube download, asian sex xxx porn tube videos, sex porn tube. Download bokep mertua vs menantu. Anak Sma Ngentot Emang Tukang Seblak Ceker Babi Bokep Indonesia Toket Crot. Vedio bokep mertua vs menantu japan related videos. Indonesia Tukang. Chess members: I'm a begginer looking to create my first opening repertoire. What I'm seeing is that the the 'official opening book' is the Encyclopedia of Chess Openings. Now I do see that this is available for download on this website but hasn't been updated since 2007. I am looking to download the most current version possible. Does anyone know where to get this and if their are any free versions. The one I have right now came with Fritz 12 and I don't know how up to date it is. Thanks again to everyone! I don't believe the ECO has it right. Whatever QGD meant originally, it has come to be used for 2.e6. I'm no expert on ECO but if you play 1. C4 c6 to the Queen's Gambit, then you are declining the gambit pawn. Thus, it is considered a line of the Queen's Gambit Declined. The same is true for 2. With all due respect, that is a ridiculous argument. You cannot 'work out logically' what the proper name for something is called. When people talk about the QGD, they are talking about 2.e6. If you view a tutorial on the internet or ESPECIALLY if you buy a book or DVD about the Queen's Gambit Declined, you will not see ANYTHING but 2.e6. So the ECO categorization has become outdated in this sense. You just stated that 'I'm no expert', well that's certainly an understatement considering you don't even know what I'm arguing for. The ECO is an authorative source, so it is 'correct' by default. But nobody else considers that to be part of the QGD anymore, as you would know if you had an absolute clue of what you were talking about. So the ECO should move on also and update its listings. The Slav is just a subset of all the possible 'declined' variations. After a gambit, you either accept or decline the gambit. If you accept it, it will be the -X- gambit Accepted. If you decline it, it will be the -X- gambit Declined. A special case is something like the albin counter-gambit, which can also be considered a variation of the Queen's Gambit declined. I found a review of Jeremy Silman's and he claims the newer editions of ECO are rubbish. Which edition is worthwhile? I've got 0 opening books and have to make heads of tails by going though games myself in my database. Is the book(s) available online or only on paperback? I'd like to take a look at it. The editions before this third edition are great/worthwhile. Thanks for the review and I wont be buying any ECOs 3rd edition myself. If you want to get ECOs then you should get the second editions. I'm no expert on ECO but if you play 1. C4 c6 to the Queen's Gambit, then you are declining the gambit pawn. Thus, it is considered a line of the Queen's Gambit Declined. The same is true for 2. With all due respect, that is a ridiculous argument. You cannot 'work out logically' what the proper name for something is called. When people talk about the QGD, they are talking about 2.e6. If you view a tutorial on the internet or ESPECIALLY if you buy a book or DVD about the Queen's Gambit Declined, you will not see ANYTHING but 2.e6. So the ECO categorization has become outdated in this sense. You just stated that 'I'm no expert', well that's certainly an understatement considering you don't even know what I'm arguing for. The ECO is an authorative source, so it is 'correct' by default. But nobody else considers that to be part of the QGD anymore, as you would know if you had an absolute clue of what you were talking about. So the ECO should move on also and update its listings. Let's see, logical deductions in chess dont' work? Got it SCID gives the opening as just Slav. ![]() Wikipedia lists it as a variation of the QGD. I would have to look at my MCO when I get home but I would bet the MCO 14 has it in the same section as QGD as a separate varation (but still under the QGD family). The ECO D book I have at home is an older edition and probably has it under that same thing Do a Google search on ECO D10. I didn't look through every link but most of the sites look like they call that the QGD Slav Defense. I guess a lot of people still consider it a QGD line and still call it that. Even Fezzik says: So yeah, ECO got it right! Apparently people still consider it such. Encyclopedia Of Chess Openings Volume I Pdf Reader FreeI'm not saying that opening variations don't evolve and get new names (that would be a stupid claim). Fezzik mentioned Biology classifications above. Chess openings are something like that games with 1. D4 d5 are in the Queens Pawn openings family, games with 2. C4 are in the Queen's Gambit Genus, if followed by 2. (analogy may be off, I'm not a Biology guy). So, I'll look at my ECO D book when I get home and see what it has. If I get a chance, I'll try and get access to a newer version and see how it is listed there. I would think however the ECO publishers have it would be considered the accepted naming/classification of the opening order (you know, since they created it). Maybe it is listed completely by itself now and no longer under QGD Slav. I think I'll go with the experts on the semantics of opening classification. MCO-14 does not have the Slav under QGD, NOBODY considers the Slav a part of the QGD anymore, except maybe people who don't have a clue of opening theory. Scid only has it that way because IT IS GETTING ITS INFORMATION FROM THE OFFICIAL SOURCE. ![]() The fact that you have the MCO-14 and thought that the Slav was under the QGD means that you hardly even looked at it (at least not the Queen's Pawn lines). Wow, anger issues much? I'll have to look at my MCO 14 when I get home. I don't do a lot of opening study and mostly just use it for some opening reference and occasionally analysis. Though, if you knew how to read, I said that SCID has it as Slav Defense; i.e. Not under GQD. As to your claim that my post was utter nonsense, that's your biased opinion. Looking at the books Amazon has, very few of them have the search inside functionality so I can't do any real research to see if your claim is correct anyway. Engelbert humperdinck discography rar. But the simple thing is, that when you say, But nobody else considers that to be part of the QGD anymore, as you would know if you had an absolute clue of what you were talking about. And NOBODY considers the Slav a part of the QGD anymore, except maybe people who don't have a clue of opening theory you are wrong. It is provably false. Encyclopedia Of Chess Openings Volume I Pdf Reader DownloadIt was proven in this topic. It is proven by a search on Google. It is proven by the ECO codes themselves. But I guess you are right. Everyone else that disagrees with you is wrong and you are absolutely right. That has to be it, because all those those other people that have the Slav listed as QGD Slav Defense don't have any idea what they are talking about either. Especially those stupid ECO publishers, Sahovski. They must be on drugs (addicted to chess). I will agree that it appears that may writers on openings do categorize the Slav as it's own, distinct variation and don't mention it being under the umbrella of the QGD. However, I doubt you have looked at all the books (I know I haven't) and can say conclusively, that none of them do. For the beginner, the best's I've seen so far is the 4-volume Chess Opening Essentials series by Djuric, Komarov, and Pantaleoni. Lots of verbal explanation, up to date on theory. Nunn's Chess Openings (NCO) by Nunn et. Is a bit dated by now, and also too advanced for a beginner. It is my favorite opening reference. Modern Chess Openings (MCO) went downhill since the times of Walter Korn. Pretty shallow in comparison to NCO, can be used as a reference. Encyclopedia Of Chess Openings Volume I Pdf Reader OnlineFundamental Chess Openings (FCO) by van der Sterren is great for beginners, but already outdated in some lines, even though it was published in 2010. If you want a single-volume opening manual, this is it. The argument here seems to be, near as I can figure: A) The Slav, i.e., 2.c6, is a way of declining the Queen's Gambit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |